On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:02, Jim Paris wrote:
> > > > + if (count > LATCH) {
> > >
> > > may be (count >= LATCH) would be even better ?
> >
> > Some PIT clones seem to hold the LATCH value momentarily judging by
> > other things that were triggered wrongly by >=
>
> If so, then that's a separate problem: the later code
>
> count = ((LATCH-1) - count) * TICK_SIZE;
> delay_at_last_interrupt = (count + LATCH/2) / LATCH;
>
It might be interesting to catch that case with a printk too and put
both in 2.5 and see what comes out in the wash yes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:39 EST