Re: ps performance sucks (was Re: dcache_rcu [performance results])

From: Kai Henningsen (kaih@khms.westfalen.de)
Date: Tue Nov 05 2002 - 14:57:00 EST


mbligh@aracnet.com (Martin J. Bligh) wrote on 04.11.02 in <1118170000.1036458859@flay>:

> I had a very brief think about this at the weekend, seeing
> if I could make a big melting pot /proc/psinfo file that did
> seqfile and read everything out in one go, using seq_file
> internally to interate over the tasklist. The most obvious
> problem that sprung to mind seems to be the tasklist locking -
> you obviously can't just hold a lock over the whole thing.

Well, one thing i to make certain you can actually do it with one or two
system calls. Say, one system call to figure out how big a buffer is
necessary (essentially, #tasks*size), then one read with a suitably-sized
buffer. Then have a loop in the kernel that drops the lock as often as
necessary, and otherwise puts it all in the buffer in one go. (If the
#tasks grows too fast so it overruns the buffer even with some slack given
in advance, tough, have a useful return code to indicate that and let ps
retry.)

I briefly thought about mmap, but I don't think that actually buys
anything.

MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:39 EST