Re: [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply

From: Tom Reinhart (rhino_tom@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 06 2002 - 13:37:46 EST


I would think the default should be a lot more conservative than that,
probably closer to 30 seconds. Much better to default to safety, and allow
knowledgable users to tradeoff for performance if they can live with the
risks.

Tom

>>There is also a longer PhD thesis by her. 10 minutes is about as much
>>work as I personally am willing to lose and try to remember. Avoiding
>>75% of writes instead of 20% is a substantial performance gain worth
>>paying a cost for. Unfortunately it is not easy to say if it is worth
>>that much cost, but I suspect it is. An approach we are exploring is
>>for blocks to reach disk earlier than that if the device is not
>>congested, on the grounds that if not much IO is occuring, then
>performance is not important.
>
>Assuming your 10 minutes are just a default and tunable by sysctl I
>hardly can see any problems at all. Paranoid people can set it to
>make any tradeoff between performance and speed they'd like including
>setting it to 0, no?

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:44 EST