On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:33:29PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Andrew Clausen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:00:10PM -0500, Mike Diehl wrote:
> > > Well, I'm a bit disapointed. My experience with LVM has been nothing short
> > > of disasterous;
> >
> > I think you'll find LVM2 much more pleasant than LVM1. It's a
> > reimplementation with a very different (minimalist :) architecture.
>
> What's the current LVM2 status? I've got EVMS up and running in a couple
> of minutes, but finding LVM2 stuff, let alone documentation, gives me a
> hard time. And yes I know it's the testing stuff at sistina.com, so I
> hope I'm looking at the right web site...
Sistina has a new website, it took me quite a few clicks to find where
they'd hidden stuff:
http://www.sistina.com/products_lvm_download.htm
or
ftp://ftp.sistina.com/pub/LVM2/
I consider LVM2 to be more bug free than LVM1, the only thing holding
people back is the fact that they will have to patch the kernel to get
dm. Then upgrading from LVM1 is simply a question of building
libdevmapper and the LVM2 tools and using them. There will be a new
release next week that will a bit more documentation.
- Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:47 EST