Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 06:21:35 EST

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
Reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 09 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:
> >You're showing a big shift in behaviour between 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-rc1.
> >Maybe it doesn't translate to worsened interactivity. Needs more
> >testing and anaysis.
>
> Sounds fair enough. My resources are exhausted though. Someone else have any
> thoughts?

Try setting lower elevator passover values. Something ala

# elvtune -r 64 /dev/hda

(or whatever your drive is)

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
Reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST