-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>On Sat, Nov 09 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> >You're showing a big shift in behaviour between 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-rc1.
>> >Maybe it doesn't translate to worsened interactivity. Needs more
>> >testing and anaysis.
>>
>> Sounds fair enough. My resources are exhausted though. Someone else have
>> any thoughts?
>
>Try setting lower elevator passover values. Something ala
>
># elvtune -r 64 /dev/hda
>
>(or whatever your drive is)
Heres some more data:
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20-rc1 [2] 1142.2 6 90 10 16.00
2420rc1r64 [3] 575.0 12 43 10 8.05
That's it then. Should I run a family of different values and if so over what
range?
Cheers,
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9zQkXF6dfvkL3i1gRAggJAKCOAWzrTxFlnPbOftzMAXPnvI7KVQCfWqUC
iDVmD1UcPDNPWCfQmlBF9yk=
=Q299
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST