Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy

From: Bruce Ferrell (bferrell@baywinds.org)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 12:08:46 EST


While the posting wasn't directly linked to kernel development, I did
find the analysis to be thought provoking. I think calling it spam
MIGHT be too strong.

john slee wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:18:24PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
>>As part of the "Better SCM" site (that is still under construction), I
>>wrote a few essays about BitKeeper:
>
>
> please do not spam the list with this crap
>
> j.
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST