Re: Voyager subarchitecture for 2.5.46

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 14:18:23 EST


Hi!

> > Unfortunately, this means "bye bye vsyscalls for gettimeofday".
>
> Not necessarily. All of the fastpatch and the checking can be done by the
> vsyscall, and if the vsyscall notices that there is a backwards jump
> in

I believe you need to *store* last value given to userland. Checking
backwards jump can be dealt with, but to check for time going
backwards you need to *store* result each result of vsyscall. I do not
think that can be done from userlnad.

> That said, I suspect that the real issue with vsyscalls is that they don't
> really make much sense. The only system call we've ever found that matters
> at all is gettimeofday(), and the vsyscall implementation there looks like
> a "cool idea, but doesn't really matter (and complicates things a lot)".

I don't like vsyscalls at all...
                                                                        Pavel

-- 
When do you have heart between your knees?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST