Re: Voyager subarchitecture for 2.5.46

From: Sean Neakums (sneakums@zork.net)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 15:02:00 EST


commence Pavel Machek quotation:

>> This is just a random sanity check thing, after all. It doesn't have to be
>> system-global or even per-cpu. The only really important thing is that
>> "gettimeofday()" should return monotonically increasing data - and if it
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> doesn't, the vsyscall would have to ask why (sometimes it's fine, if
>> somebody did a settimeofday, but usually it's a sign of trouble).
>
> I believe you need it system-global. If task A tells task B "its
> 10:30:00" and than task B does gettimeofday and gets "10:29:59", it
> will be confused for sure.

Hence the requirement that it be monotonically increasing.

-- 
 /                          |
[|] Sean Neakums            |  Questions are a burden to others;
[|] <sneakums@zork.net>     |      answers a prison for oneself.
 \                          |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST