RE: Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?

• Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [PATCH] Module loader against 2.5.46: 8/9"
• Previous message: Martin Knoblauch: "RE: Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin Knoblauch: "Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?"
• Next in thread: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> I, too get 1600 using the Force 4203 motherboard with GC-LE chipset. Same
> CPU and RAM ...
>
> Thanks
> Manish

 hmm. 1600 sounds a lot more like, although not really impressive IMO.
Of course I cwould be happy to see those numbers. :-(

Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Whitmore [mailto:linuxkernel@orcon.net.nz]
> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 5:23 PM
> To: Alan Cox; Dave Jones
> Cc: Martin Knoblauch; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?
>
> I get 1600 on a similar machine but with a Intel SHG2 motherboard
> (ServerWorks GC LE Chipset as well) (Same RAM + Processors)
> Maybe not a very good Motherboard you have?
>
> Thanks
> Craig
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [PATCH] Module loader against 2.5.46: 8/9"
• Previous message: Martin Knoblauch: "RE: Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin Knoblauch: "Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?"
• Next in thread: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: Memory performance on Serverworks GC-LE based system poor?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST