Re: [PATCH] module_name()

• Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "path_release missing or not?"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid"
• In reply to: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] module_name()"
• Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] module_name()"
• Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] module_name()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
   Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 04:32:58 +1100

   I prefer this: it also has the advantage of ensuring the name of
   built-in modules is consistent across the kernel.
   
I'd rather get NULL for built-in, this also eliminates
the issue of having umpteen "[built-in]" string copies in
the kernel since this is expanded by an inline.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "path_release missing or not?"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid"
• In reply to: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] module_name()"
• Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] module_name()"
• Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] module_name()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST