Re: tcp_v4_get_port?

• Next message: Nero: "Re: [CHECKER] 18 potential security holes"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN"
• Maybe in reply to: Folkert van Heusden: "tcp_v4_get_port?"
• Next in thread: Folkert van Heusden: "RE: tcp_v4_get_port?"
• Reply: Folkert van Heusden: "RE: tcp_v4_get_port?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Am I right that in net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c in function "tcp_v4_get_port" the
> portnumber for a new connection is generated? Because fiddling with that
> code seems to have no effect on the portnumbers generated for new
> connections.

What change are you making and which kernel are you making it in?

thanks,
Nivedita

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Nero: "Re: [CHECKER] 18 potential security holes"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN"
• Maybe in reply to: Folkert van Heusden: "tcp_v4_get_port?"
• Next in thread: Folkert van Heusden: "RE: tcp_v4_get_port?"
• Reply: Folkert van Heusden: "RE: tcp_v4_get_port?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST