Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN

• Next message: Neil Brown: "PATCH - avoid 'defined but not used' warning in xor.h on i386"
• Previous message: OGAWA Hirofumi: "pci_unregister_driver() problem?"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN"
• Next in thread: Roland Dreier: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@redhat.com> writes:

    Roland> if I wrote a patch to do this would you accept it? (And
    Roland> following that increase MAX_ADDR_LEN?)

    David> I would have to see it first, but likely yes.

Of course, that's what I would expect. (And I expect to go through a
few revisions before it's good enough) I just don't want to start on
something that you think is categorically a stupid idea.

I will code up the rtnetlink extensions I proposed and post them when
they are ready.

Thanks,
  Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Neil Brown: "PATCH - avoid 'defined but not used' warning in xor.h on i386"
• Previous message: OGAWA Hirofumi: "pci_unregister_driver() problem?"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN"
• Next in thread: Roland Dreier: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST