Re: [PATCH] new timeout behavior for RPC requests on TCP sockets

From: Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 11:49:30 EST


>>>>> " " == Richard B Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> writes:

> If the application "chooses to drop the request", the kernel is
> not required to fix that application. The RPC cannot retransmit
> if it has been shut-down or disconnected, which is about the
> only way the application could "choose to drop the request". So
> something doesn't smell right here.

An NFS server is perfectly free to drop an RPC request if it doesn't
have the necessary free resources to service it (i.e. if it is out of
memory). If the client doesn't time out + retry, you lose data. Not a
good idea...

Cheers,
  Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST