Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available.

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 18:04:08 EST


> Yep, that's what he meant (further clarified locally on IRC)... zaitcev->sparc32 bugs, and davem->sparc64 bugs.

OK, I'll get that fixed up.
 
>> > admin load, because Bugzilla is not going to be self-running.
>> > Who is that person?
>>
>> I'm hoping to spread the admin load out amongst different people -
>> one of the things for a system like this is that it's easier to scale
>> it up by spreading the load. Anything that's not picked up by external
>> people will have the slack picked up by some IBM people, to make sure
>> the database doesn't end up as a fetid cesspit of festering stale
>> misinformation ;-)
>
> I just re-assigned a bug, which generated a request in my mind: is
> there a default bug assignee besides you? :)

The default assignee depends on the category you file into.
I own a lot of them right now because there's nobody else to do it
(though I have various volounteers now, so thats increasingly less
true ...yay!).

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:34 EST