Re: unusual scheduling performance

From: Dave Hansen (haveblue@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 13:56:11 EST

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> fs/eventpoll.c | 2 ++
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>>--- 25/fs/eventpoll.c~hey Mon Nov 18 10:13:40 2002
>>+++ 25-akpm/fs/eventpoll.c Mon Nov 18 10:14:01 2002
>>@@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ void eventpoll_release(struct file *file
>> if (list_empty(lsthead))
>> return;
>>
>>+ printk("hey!\n");
>>+
>
> Andrew, if you don't use epoll there's no way you get there. The function
> eventpoll_file_init() initialize the list at each file* init in
> fs/file_table.c
> If you're not using epoll and you get there, someone is screwing up the
> data inside the struct file

That little tidbit isn't even in .47. Is that patch against one of
the 2.5.47-mm's? 

-- 
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST