Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5.48] Fixed ifdefs for a label in ncpfs/sock.c

From: Petr Vandrovec (vandrove@vc.cvut.cz)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 16:50:50 EST


On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:58:23PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:02:17PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:52:36AM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
> > > diff -Nru a/fs/ncpfs/sock.c b/fs/ncpfs/sock.c
> > > --- a/fs/ncpfs/sock.c Tue Nov 19 10:31:17 2002
> > > +++ b/fs/ncpfs/sock.c Tue Nov 19 10:31:17 2002
> > > @@ -587,7 +587,9 @@
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > > type = ntohs(server->rcv.buf.type);
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NCPFS_PACKET_SIGNING
> > > cont:;
> > > +#endif
> > > if (type != NCP_REPLY) {
> > > if (datalen - 8 <= sizeof(server->unexpected_packet.data)) {
> >
> > Eww, personally I think the fix is worse than the warning.
> >
> > Dave
> I know. I personally hate #ifdef's and goto's... I spent more than a few
> minutes trying to find a "trivial" way to clean this up, but this was
> the best I could do without reorganizing LOTS of code (then it's not
> "trivial" anymore).

If you want just eliminate some gotos (and eventually warnings... you should
always enable packet signing, btw), try this one ;-) But I'm not sure
that code below is better than using goto...
                                                        Petr Vandrovec
                                                        (ncpfs maintainer)

diff -u linux-2.5.48-c903.dist/fs/ncpfs/sock.c linux-2.5.48-c903/fs/ncpfs/sock.c
--- linux-2.5.48-c903.dist/fs/ncpfs/sock.c 2002-11-19 15:28:26.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.5.48-c903/fs/ncpfs/sock.c 2002-11-19 22:46:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -584,10 +584,12 @@
                                         server->rcv.len = 8;
                                         server->rcv.state = 4;
                                         break;
- }
+ case 4:
+ datalen = server->rcv.buf.len;
+ type = ntohs(server->rcv.buf.type2);
+ } else
 #endif
                                 type = ntohs(server->rcv.buf.type);
-cont:;
                                 if (type != NCP_REPLY) {
                                         if (datalen - 8 <= sizeof(server->unexpected_packet.data)) {
                                                 *(__u16*)(server->unexpected_packet.data) = htons(type);
@@ -622,12 +624,6 @@
                                 server->rcv.len = datalen - 10;
                                 server->rcv.state = 1;
                                 break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NCPFS_PACKET_SIGNING
- case 4:
- datalen = server->rcv.buf.len;
- type = ntohs(server->rcv.buf.type2);
- goto cont;
-#endif
                         case 1:
                                 req = server->rcv.creq;
                                 if (req->tx_type != NCP_ALLOC_SLOT_REQUEST) {
@@ -652,20 +648,20 @@
                                 }
 #endif
                                 ncp_finish_request(req, req->datalen);
- nextreq:;
+ if (0) {
+ case 3:
+ ncp_finish_request(server->rcv.creq, -EIO);
+ }
                                 __ncp_next_request(server);
+ if (0) {
+ case 5:
+ info_server(server, 0, server->unexpected_packet.data, server->unexpected_packet.len);
+ }
                         case 2:
- next:;
                                 server->rcv.ptr = (unsigned char*)&server->rcv.buf;
                                 server->rcv.len = 10;
                                 server->rcv.state = 0;
                                 break;
- case 3:
- ncp_finish_request(server->rcv.creq, -EIO);
- goto nextreq;
- case 5:
- info_server(server, 0, server->unexpected_packet.data, server->unexpected_packet.len);
- goto next;
                 }
         }
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST