Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 17:09:11 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Previous message: Mark H. Wood: "One more time: /usr/include/linux, /usr/include/asm"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> So it is business as usual, all sabre noise but none drawn.
> So it is a draw ?

Basically.

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Previous message: Mark H. Wood: "One more time: /usr/include/linux, /usr/include/asm"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST