From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> Yes, I looked at that but concluded that someone (you?)
> had added the assignment just to preserve the guarantee
> previously given by get_empty_inode() at the moment it
> was replaced by new_inode(). But it is superfluous, I think.
Existing userland doesn't, though.
I saw that you hit fuser last year, but this is 2.5.
Any other examples?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:37 EST