On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:52:59AM -0800, wli@holomorphy.com wrote:
>> Give quot a default value so it's initialized. rmk, this is yours
>> to ack.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:19:13AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Why can't we get this obvious compiler bug fixed? I'd rather have
> the compiler bug fixed rather than trying to work around the bogus
> warning.
> It's obvious that the loop:
> for (try = 0; try < 3; try++)
> is going to be executed at least once, which will initialise quot.
> As for the second hunk, its correct in so far as it'll catch the case
> where we can't even do 9600 baud. However, I think we should just
> bound the lowest baud rate such that we can always do 9600 baud (and
> therefore this function will never return zero.)
Linus, please count this as a NAK wrt. the serial changes in this set.
They'll be dealt with at the toolchain level.
Thanks,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:22 EST