Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

• Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
• Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: /proc/pci deprecation?"
• In reply to: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
• Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> The current system call restart doesn't change the system call number. We just
> substract two from the psw address (aka eip) and go back to user space.

You're not looking at a recent 2.5.x tree with the nanosleep() restart
logic.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?"
• Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: /proc/pci deprecation?"
• In reply to: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
• Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:15 EST