RE: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs

From: Grover, Andrew (andrew.grover@intel.com)
Date: Mon Dec 16 2002 - 18:02:31 EST


> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@suse.cz]
> Ouch, I started implementing that hour ago... [Never mind, very little
> damage done so far].

Wow you work fast. ;-)

> But... Metolious sounds *needed*; how do you access voltage sensors
> without metolious, in a way that can coexist with ACPI thermal
> support?

(I think you mean thermal sensors)

A solution in search of a problem. I can say this because I helped define
it. :)

The machines that care about manageability (servers) appear to be entirely
disjoint from the ones that have thermal zones (and, servers use IPMI),
therefore thermal chip contention doesn't happen. And, Metolious required a
fair amount of AML code.

-- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST