[PATCH] Fix 4 compile time warnings in 2.5.53

From: Martin J. Bligh (fletch@aracnet.com)
Date: Tue Dec 24 2002 - 12:36:43 EST


Fix the following warnings:

drivers/serial/core.c: In function `uart_get_divisor':
drivers/serial/core.c:390: warning: `quot' might be used uninitialized in
this function
net/ipv4/route.c: In function `rt_cache_seq_stop':
net/ipv4/route.c:279: warning: unused variable `st'
drivers/net/starfire.c: In function `netdev_close':
drivers/net/starfire.c:1851: warning: unsigned int format, different type
arg (arg 2)
drivers/net/starfire.c:1858: warning: unsigned int format, different type
arg (arg 2)
arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c:691: warning: `wakeup_secondary_via_INIT'
defined but not used

My build is now eerily quiet.

M.

diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude virgin/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
fix_numaq_warning/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
--- virgin/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c Mon Dec 23 23:01:44 2002
+++ fix_numaq_warning/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c Tue Dec 24 08:58:44 2002
@@ -596,6 +596,8 @@ static inline void inquire_remote_apic(i
 }
 #endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
+
 static int __init wakeup_secondary_via_NMI(int logical_apicid)
 /*
  * Poke the other CPU in the eye to wake it up. Remember that the normal
@@ -644,6 +646,8 @@ static int __init wakeup_secondary_via_N
         return (send_status | accept_status);
 }

+#else /* ! CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ */
+
 static int __init wakeup_secondary_via_INIT(int phys_apicid, unsigned long
start_eip)
 {
         unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
@@ -766,6 +770,8 @@ static int __init wakeup_secondary_via_I

         return (send_status | accept_status);
 }
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ */

 extern unsigned long cpu_initialized;

diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude virgin/net/ipv4/route.c
fix_rtcache_warning/net/ipv4/route.c
--- virgin/net/ipv4/route.c Mon Dec 23 23:01:58 2002
+++ fix_rtcache_warning/net/ipv4/route.c Tue Dec 24 09:21:00 2002
@@ -275,11 +275,8 @@ static void *rt_cache_seq_next(struct se

 static void rt_cache_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
- if (v && v != (void *)1) {
- struct rt_cache_iter_state *st = seq->private;
-
+ if (v && v != (void *)1)
                 rcu_read_unlock();
- }
 }

 static int rt_cache_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude virgin/drivers/serial/core.c
fix_serial_warning/drivers/serial/core.c
--- virgin/drivers/serial/core.c Fri Dec 13 23:18:02 2002
+++ fix_serial_warning/drivers/serial/core.c Tue Dec 24 08:56:28 2002
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ uart_get_divisor(struct uart_port *port,
                 baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios);
                 quot = uart_calculate_quot(port, baud);
                 if (quot)
- break;
+ return quot;

                 /*
                  * Oops, the quotient was zero. Try again with
diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude virgin/drivers/net/starfire.c
fix_starfire_warning/drivers/net/starfire.c
--- virgin/drivers/net/starfire.c Fri Dec 13 23:17:59 2002
+++ fix_starfire_warning/drivers/net/starfire.c Tue Dec 24 09:18:12 2002
@@ -1847,15 +1847,15 @@ static int netdev_close(struct net_devic

 #ifdef __i386__
         if (debug > 2) {
- printk("\n"KERN_DEBUG" Tx ring at %8.8x:\n",
- np->tx_ring_dma);
+ printk("\n"KERN_DEBUG" Tx ring at %9.9Lx:\n",
+ (u64) np->tx_ring_dma);
                 for (i = 0; i < 8 /* TX_RING_SIZE is huge! */; i++)
                         printk(KERN_DEBUG " #%d desc. %8.8x %8.8x -> %8.8x.\n",
                                i, le32_to_cpu(np->tx_ring[i].status),
                                le32_to_cpu(np->tx_ring[i].first_addr),
                                le32_to_cpu(np->tx_done_q[i].status));
- printk(KERN_DEBUG " Rx ring at %8.8x -> %p:\n",
- np->rx_ring_dma, np->rx_done_q);
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG " Rx ring at %9.9Lx -> %p:\n",
+ (u64) np->rx_ring_dma, np->rx_done_q);
                 if (np->rx_done_q)
                         for (i = 0; i < 8 /* RX_RING_SIZE */; i++) {
                                 printk(KERN_DEBUG " #%d desc. %8.8x -> %8.8x\n",

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:07 EST