get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?

From: Marc-Christian Petersen (m.c.p@wolk-project.de)
Date: Tue Dec 24 2002 - 16:01:40 EST

Next message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PROBLEM][2.5.52][USB] USB Device unusable"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi there,

is there _any_ reason why below patch isn't merged yet?

I don't see any reason why this won't make it into mainline!

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.20pre5aa2/10_get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted-4

ciao, Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PROBLEM][2.5.52][USB] USB Device unusable"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:07 EST