On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Jeff Dike wrote:
> This is a large patch, but
> it's all under arch/um and include/asm-um
> a lot of it is code movement
Pulled, but that /proc/mm crap has to go (it wasn't in this patch, or I
would have rejected it).
What are the semantics the host code wants/needs, and how can we implement
a sane generic mechanism that doesn't involve opening magic files?
Having co-processes isn't wrong in itself, I just want the support to be
clean and generic, instead of a huge hack.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:12 EST