Re: How much we can trust packet timestamping

From: uaca@alumni.uv.es
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 08:01:48 EST


On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 01:09:03PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 11:28, uaca@alumni.uv.es wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > IMHO The problem is quite complicated because
> >
> > + common hardware is not designed for real time:
> >
> > - sends multiple PDUs within one interrupt, and can be delayed
> > - Host adapter bus & infraestructure is not designed to garantee latency
> > etc...
>
> The packet can be timestamped by the hardware receiving as well as by
> the kernel netif_rx code. This is actually intentional and there is
> hardware that supports doing IRQ raise time sampling which the driver
> can then use to get very accurate data.

Thanks Alan

Anybody know about a Linux driver that supports doing IRQ raise time
sampling? any doc/pointer/suggestion would be greatly appreciated

Thanks in advance

        Ulisses
                Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso

---> Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la <---
---> Asociación Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <---
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:16 EST