On 8 Jan 2003, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:32, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
> > Someone else suggested putting all the low level options like preempt,
> > smp, and the stuff in kernel-hacking into a single menu, with a better
> > name.
>
> I do not think I like this. SMP, kernel preemption, and high memory
> support are the three most fundamental choices one makes during
> configuration.
I guess, depending on your definition of fundemental. I would put any
option which affects the kernel as a whole in that category, myself.
Compiling with frame pointers comes to mind, since every object file is
changed and there are performance implications as well.
> They should be out in the open, in the beginning, in a well-labeled
> category. They only issue I see is "processor options" should be
> renamed "core options" or whatever. But that is trivial.
Processor option would select the processor and any architecture dependent
options, I would think. Something like "kernel characteristics" could have
options like smp.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:24 EST