Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 02:39:28 EST

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch 2.5] 2-pass PCI probing, generic part"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> writes:
> I removed the spaces between the funcname and the brackets tho.

Curses, foiled again!

-Miles

-- 
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch 2.5] 2-pass PCI probing, generic part"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself."
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:31 EST