Re: Another idea for simplifying locking in kernel/module.c

From: Adam J. Richter (adam@yggdrasil.com)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 04:38:03 EST


On Thu, 09 Jan 2003, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>At 12:53 AM 1/7/2003 -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>>I wrote:
>>> Here is a way to replace all of the specialized "stop CPU"
>>>locking code in kernel/module.c with an rw_semaphore by using
>>>down_read_trylock in try_module_get() and down_write when beginning to
>>>unload the module.
>>>
>>> The following UNTESTED patch, a net deletion of 136 lines,
>>
>> I am running that patch now on two computers. It seems to
>>be OK.
>>
>> Rusty, I'd be interested in knowing what you think of the
>>patch (likewise for other lkml readers).

>We have to be able to call try_module_get() from interrupt context.

        Where? Why? Please show me one or more examples.

Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
                         "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST