Re: [PATCH] Prevent .gnu.linkonce.this_module section from being merged with other sections

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 04:39:39 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Another idea for simplifying locking in kernel/module.c"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Another idea for simplifying locking in kernel/module.c"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent .gnu.linkonce.this_module section from being merged with other sections"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> writes:
> > +++ linux-2.5.55-moo/Makefile 2003-01-09 14:07:36.000000000 +0900
> > -LDFLAGS_MODULE = -r
> > +LDFLAGS_MODULE = -r --unique=.gnu.linkonce.this_module
>
> No! Does this not work?
>
> +++ working-2.5.55-strlen/arch/v850/Makefile 2003-01-10 19:32:09.000000000 +1100
> +LDFLAGS_MODULE += --unique=.gnu.linkonce.this_module

That'll probably work too.

[Though since the module loader depends on .gnu.linkonce.this_module
being a unique section, I think the global option should be OK as well]

-Miles

-- 
Is it true that nothing can be known?  If so how do we know this?  -Woody Allen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Another idea for simplifying locking in kernel/module.c"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Another idea for simplifying locking in kernel/module.c"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent .gnu.linkonce.this_module section from being merged with other sections"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST