On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:10:24PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/intel-iscsi
[..]
> > Don't know what the state of interop with other initiators is though.
> >
> > I'll also point out that for many Linux<->Linux purposes, nbd is a workable
> > substitute.
>
> You are so correct in the Linux<->Linux model, but remember the other OS
> has the dominate market space.
Really? Must admit I haven't been paying attention to FreeBSD lately.. ;)
> I have proof of interoperability. Better yet I have performance
> proof without the ability to control the benchmark environment.
I'm sure that's great, but until it's also DFSG compliant, it's
effectively vaporware in my book.
> IIRC that reference is set at version 6.
They're actually up to 18.
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:36 EST