Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 14:26:25 EST


On 12 Jan 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Looks good. Might also be good to clarify in the help whether the PII/PIII
> option also skips using lock decb for the spinlocks and the other fence
> workarounds for the PPro fence errata.

The thing I reacted to was that the P4 entry should include the P4-based
celerons. I have no idea what those are called, though.

Anyway, applied.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:41 EST