Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 14:53:47 EST

Next message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4"
In reply to: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Reply: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [robw@optonline.net]
>
> Am I wrong that the above would do the same thing without generating the
> sphagetti code that a goto would give you. Gotos are BAD, very very
> bad.

Whom do I pay to have this annoying clueless asshole shot?
OH MY GOD, I really can't take any more.

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4"
In reply to: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Reply: Rob Wilkens: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:41 EST