Re: exception tables in 2.5.55

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 00:26:48 EST

Next message: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: "2.5.56, modules, and RedHat Psyche"
Previous message: Roland McGrath: "Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA"
In reply to: Greg Ungerer: "Re: exception tables in 2.5.55"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: exception tables in 2.5.55"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <3E223756.3010200@snapgear.com> you write:
> OK, heres an alternative patch that fully supports exception tables
> for m68knommu (Miles you'll need to do the same for v850).

This seems way overkill. How about you move the search_extable()
prototype out of linux/module.h and into each asm/uaccess.h, then:

include/asm-m68knommu/uaccess.h:

        /* We don't use such things. */
        struct exception_table_entry
        {
                int unused;
        };

#define search_extable(first, last, value) ({ BUG(); NULL; })

Thoughts?
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: "2.5.56, modules, and RedHat Psyche"
Previous message: Roland McGrath: "Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA"
In reply to: Greg Ungerer: "Re: exception tables in 2.5.55"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: exception tables in 2.5.55"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:44 EST