Hi Christoph,
I just finished some experiments which show that the finetuning can
really be left for later. So this approach is ok for me. I hope we can
get enough support for integrating this tiny numa scheduler.
I didn't do all possible measurements, the interesting ones are with
patches 1-4 (nb-smooth) and 1-5 (nb-sm-var1, nb-sm-var2) applied. They
show pretty consistent results (within error bars). The fine-tuning in
patch #5 doesn't buy us much right now (on my platform), so we can
leave it out.
Here's the data:
Results on a 8 CPU ia64 machine with 4 nodes (2 CPUs per node).
kernbench:
elapsed user system
stock52 134.52(0.84) 951.64(0.97) 20.72(0.22)
sched52 133.19(1.49) 944.24(0.50) 21.36(0.24)
minsched52 135.47(0.47) 937.61(0.20) 21.30(0.14)
nb-smooth 133.61(0.71) 944.71(0.35) 21.22(0.22)
nb-sm-var1 135.23(2.07) 943.78(0.54) 21.54(0.17)
nb-sm-var2 133.87(0.61) 944.18(0.62) 21.32(0.13)
schedbench/hackbench: time(s)
10 25 50 100
stock52 0.81(0.04) 2.06(0.07) 4.09(0.13) 7.89(0.25)
sched52 0.81(0.04) 2.03(0.07) 4.14(0.20) 8.61(0.35)
minsched52 1.28(0.05) 3.19(0.06) 6.59(0.13) 13.56(0.27)
nb-smooth 0.77(0.03) 1.94(0.04) 3.80(0.06) 7.97(0.35)
nb-sm-var1 0.81(0.05) 2.01(0.09) 3.89(0.21) 8.20(0.34)
nb-sm-var2 0.82(0.04) 2.10(0.09) 4.19(0.14) 8.15(0.24)
numabench/numa_test 4
AvgUserTime ElapsedTime TotUserTime TotSysTime
stock52 --- 27.23(0.52) 89.30(4.18) 0.09(0.01)
sched52 22.32(1.00) 27.39(0.42) 89.29(4.02) 0.10(0.01)
minsched52 20.01(0.01) 23.40(0.13) 80.05(0.02) 0.08(0.01)
nb-smooth 21.01(0.79) 24.70(2.75) 84.04(3.15) 0.09(0.01)
nb-sm-var1 21.39(0.83) 26.03(2.15) 85.56(3.31) 0.09(0.01)
nb-sm-var2 22.18(0.74) 27.36(0.42) 88.72(2.94) 0.09(0.01)
numabench/numa_test 8
AvgUserTime ElapsedTime TotUserTime TotSysTime
stock52 --- 27.50(2.58) 174.74(6.66) 0.18(0.01)
sched52 21.73(1.00) 33.70(1.82) 173.87(7.96) 0.18(0.01)
minsched52 20.31(0.00) 23.50(0.12) 162.47(0.04) 0.16(0.01)
nb-smooth 20.46(0.44) 24.21(1.95) 163.68(3.56) 0.16(0.01)
nb-sm-var1 20.45(0.44) 23.95(1.73) 163.62(3.49) 0.17(0.01)
nb-sm-var2 20.71(0.82) 23.78(2.42) 165.74(6.58) 0.17(0.01)
numabench/numa_test 16
AvgUserTime ElapsedTime TotUserTime TotSysTime
stock52 --- 52.68(1.51) 390.03(15.10) 0.34(0.01)
sched52 21.51(0.80) 47.18(3.24) 344.29(12.78) 0.36(0.01)
minsched52 20.50(0.03) 43.82(0.08) 328.05(0.45) 0.34(0.01)
nb-smooth 21.12(0.69) 47.42(4.02) 337.99(10.99) 0.34(0.01)
nb-sm-var1 21.18(0.77) 48.19(5.05) 338.94(12.38) 0.34(0.01)
nb-sm-var2 21.69(0.91) 49.05(4.36) 347.03(14.49) 0.34(0.01)
numabench/numa_test 32
AvgUserTime ElapsedTime TotUserTime TotSysTime
stock52 --- 102.60(3.89) 794.57(31.72) 0.65(0.01)
sched52 21.93(0.57) 92.46(1.10) 701.75(18.38) 0.67(0.02)
minsched52 20.64(0.10) 89.95(3.16) 660.72(3.13) 0.68(0.07)
nb-smooth 20.95(0.19) 86.63(1.74) 670.56(6.02) 0.66(0.02)
nb-sm-var1 21.47(0.54) 90.95(3.28) 687.12(17.42) 0.67(0.02)
nb-sm-var2 21.45(0.67) 89.91(3.80) 686.47(21.37) 0.68(0.02)
The kernels used:
- stock52 : 2.5.52 + ia64 patch
- sched52 : stock52 + old numa scheduler
- minisched52 : stock52 + miniature NUMA scheduler (cannot load
balance across nodes)
- nb-smooth : minisched52 + node balancer + smooth node load patch
- nb-sm-var1 : nb-smooth + variable internode_lb, (MIN,MAX) = (4,40)
- nb-sm-var2 : nb-smooth + variable internode_lb, (MIN,MAX) = (1,16)
Best regards,
Erich
On Monday 13 January 2003 16:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Anyone interested in this cleaned up minimal numa scheduler? This
> is basically Erich's patches 1-3 with my suggestions applied.
>
> This does not mean I don't like 4 & 5, but I'd rather get a small,
> non-intrusive patch into Linus' tree now and do the fine-tuning later.
>
[...]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:45 EST