RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup

From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh (venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 13:29:27 EST


Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of
replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?

Thanks,
-Venkatesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: Protasevich, Natalie
> Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; 'William Lee Irwin III'; Nakajima,
> Jun; 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'James Cleverdon'; 'Linux Kernel'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
>
>
> > I ran into a couple places where CONFIG_X86_NUMA is still
> there (replaced
> > now with CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ), which disables following defines:
>
> Yeah, I saw those the other day. Should probably be replaced with
> CONFIG_NUMA ... I'll tweak them once I get the last dribbles of Summit
> pushed out to Linus.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 22:00:55 EST