Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix

From: Martin J. Bligh (
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 01:05:31 EST

I'm not keen on the way the minisched patch got reformatted. I changed
it into a seperate function, which I think is much cleaner by the time
you've added the third patch - no #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA in load_balance.

Rejigged patches attatched, no functional changes.

Anyway, I perf tested this, and it comes out more or less the same as
the tuned version I was poking at last night (ie best of the bunch).
Looks pretty good to me.


PS. The fourth patch was so small, and touching the same stuff as 3
that I rolled it into the third one here. Seems like a universal
benefit ;-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:12 EST