Robert Macaulay <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > if you could please test that with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
> Reverting that brings the speed back up
OK. How irritating.
Presumably there's a fairness problem - once a CPU goes in there to start
spinning on the lock, the length of the loop is such that it's easy for
non-holders to zoom in and claim it first. Or something.
Unless another way of solving the problem which that patch solves presents
itself we may need to revert it.
Or not. Should a CONFIG_PREEMPT SMP kernel compromise its latency because of
I'd appreciate it if you could take a closer look at the mysterious
self-reverting .config, please. See if you can work out what is causing it,
tell me how you're rebooting (reboot -f? -fn? Big Red Button?) and whether
the offending file is on the root filesystem, etc.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:12 EST