Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 12:27:19 EST

Next message: Mark F.: "2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.."
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:28:18AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> The reason why the patch was not accepted is that it changes one magic
> number to another magic number, and without chipset docs, I had no idea
> what either magic number really meant.

Whilst on the subject of magic numbers in net drivers, did we ever get
to the bottom of 2.4's ChangeSet 1.587.9.20

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davej/patches/2.5/2.5.48/split-dj1/net-cs89x0-media-corrections.diff

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark F.: "2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.."
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:16 EST