> I repeated the tests with your B0 version and it's still not
> satisfying. Maybe too aggressive NODE_REBALANCE_IDLE_TICK, maybe the
> difference is that the other calls of load_balance() never have the
> chance to balance across nodes.
Nope, I found the problem. The topo cleanups are broken - we end up
taking all mem accesses, etc to node 0.
Use the second half of the patch (the splitup I already posted),
and fix the obvious compile error. Works fine now ;-)
Matt, you know the topo stuff better than anyone. Can you take a look
at the cleanup Ingo did, and see if it's easily fixable?
PS. Ingo - I love the restructuring of the scheduler bits.
I think we need > 2 multipler though ... I set it to 10 for now.
Tuning will tell ...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:17 EST