Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-pre3-ac oops

From: Andre Hedrick (
Date: Sun Jan 19 2003 - 18:27:33 EST

One thing to ask, did you get an 0x51 , 0x04 error set prior to seeing the
flush cache message error?

If not then those changes need to be stripped out as more proof of letting
the device protect itself from properly formed commands.

The change to hid one noise maker pollutes another wrongly.

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Bryan Andersen wrote:

> To me they seam like a candidate for output at a higher
> debug level or ide specific debug. They aren't a driver
> setup, odd condition, or error message.
> - Bryan
> Tupshin Harper wrote:
> > Andre Hedrick wrote:
> >
> >> Exactly when you want to flush the devices to platter.
> >> The problem will be what to do if we get an error on flush-cache.
> >>
> > Are these "no cach flush required" messages going to be removed? It does
> > clutter up the boot process output pretty badly.

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:22 EST