Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59

From: Russell Coker (
Date: Sun Jan 19 2003 - 20:05:41 EST

On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:39:39AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > What's the reason you can't just live with DAC for sysctls?
> >
> > What exactly do you mean by "live with DAC" in this context? If you mean
> > "allow UID==0 processes to do whatever they like" then it's not going to
> > work for any sort of chroot setup.
> This means check the unix file permissions / ACLs only overriden by
> CAP_FOWNER processes.

I don't think that would do for my chroot environments. I want to have root
owned processes running in a chroot with no ability to escape or to affect
the outside environment (and proc is mounted in the chroot).

--   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark  My home page

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:22 EST