Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 01:10:13 EST

Next message: Andreas Hartmann: "Antwort: Re: [i2c-piix4.o: IBM Laptop detected; this module may corrupt your serial eeprom! Refusing to load module!] on xSeries 232 -Server"
Previous message: Aniruddha M Marathe: "[BENCHMARK] TIObench performance of 2.5.59"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'm totally fine with this work, in fact I consider it
a cleanup.

I could call it a bug fix, but that would be stretching it :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Hartmann: "Antwort: Re: [i2c-piix4.o: IBM Laptop detected; this module may corrupt your serial eeprom! Refusing to load module!] on xSeries 232 -Server"
Previous message: Aniruddha M Marathe: "[BENCHMARK] TIObench performance of 2.5.59"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:22 EST