How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?

From: stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 04:21:43 EST

Next message: Guo, Min: "RE: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi, Greg!
After reading the pci_hotplug_core.c, I found there are many codes
that are used to implement the pcihpfs. And how about using sysfs instead
of pcihpfs ? I think it could make the pci_hotplug_core.c smaller. Another
pro is that we will nerver be bothered by the pcihpfs' bug.
How you think about it?

Regards,
Stanley Wang

-- Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel Corporation

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Guo, Min: "RE: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:22 EST