Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2

From: Ingo Molnar (
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 11:59:39 EST

On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> I think we definitely need to tune this on a per-arch basis. There's no
> way that one-size-fits-all is going to fit a situation as complex as
> this (though we can definitely learn from each other's analysis).

agreed - although the tunable should be constant (if possible, or
boot-established but not /proc exported), and there should be as few
tunables as possible. We already tune some of our scheduler behavior to
the SMP cachesize. (the cache_decay_ticks SMP logic.)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:23 EST