Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

From: Pavel Machek (
Date: Sun Jan 19 2003 - 11:05:15 EST


> > - Flaws in error recovery paths in certain situations
> > - Lots of random oopses on boot/remove that were apparently
> > introduced by the kobject/sysfs people and need chasing
> > down. (There are some non sysfs ones mostly fixed)
> I guess the kobject/sysfs stuff could be ripped out if it doesn't
> work - it is probably not a "must have" feature.

sysfs is needed to properly flush caches on powerdown and for
S3/S4 suspend/resume to work.

Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:24 EST