Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?

From: Horst von Brand (brand@jupiter.cs.uni-dortmund.de)
Date: Tue Jan 21 2003 - 03:51:14 EST


David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> said:

[...]

> >So is shipping the source without a neuron dump of the programmer -
> >let's face
> >it, we've ALL looked at code and said "What WERE they thinking?",
> >and therefor
> >a neuron dump would be part of the *preferred* format.

> If the people who make most of the modifications have access to and
> use such a dump in the process of making modifications, then it would
> probably be part of the preferred form.

Hummm. _now_ I see the fundamental problem: The GPL isn't distributed with
a neuron dump of RMS so we can check what he meant by "preferred format".
Seems the GPL is being distributed illegally...

[Can we let this die, now? Pretty please?]

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST