Re: Spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ????

From: Pavel Janík (Pavel@Janik.cz)
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 15:53:31 EST

Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: why isn't quota dependant on ext2?"
Previous message: Stephen D. Smalley: "[RFC][PATCH] Restore LSM hook calls to sendfile"
In reply to: Ville Hallivuori: "Re: Spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ????"
Next in thread: AnonimoVeneziano: "Re: Spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ????"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Ville Hallivuori <vph@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 22:06:30 +0200

> Dec 23 20:34:37 mood kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.

Could we possible append an URL to Intels' spec to reduce the traffic here?
Any volunteer to do that?

-- Pavel Janík

I'm simply not a good maintainer, because I'm too impatient and get too bored with it. -- Linus Torvalds in LKML - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: why isn't quota dependant on ext2?"
Previous message: Stephen D. Smalley: "[RFC][PATCH] Restore LSM hook calls to sendfile"
In reply to: Ville Hallivuori: "Re: Spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ????"
Next in thread: AnonimoVeneziano: "Re: Spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 ????"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:30 EST