RE: [PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)

• Next message: Austin Gonyou: "Using O(1) scheduler with 600 processes."
• Previous message: Lee Chin: "Re: debate on 700 threads vs asynchronous code"
• Maybe in reply to: Grover, Andrew: "[PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)"
• Next in thread: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)"
• Reply: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Dave Jones [mailto:davej@codemonkey.org.uk]
> I've noticed that with .59 some of my boxes no longer have
> functioning NICs unless I boot with acpi=off. Packets get
> transmitted, but nothing ever gets received.
> Seen this with a 3c509, an 8139, and an e100.
>
> Known bug? Fixed in this patch ?

Known bug. Not fixed in this patch. Are you sure this is new in recent
kernels?

Regards -- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Austin Gonyou: "Using O(1) scheduler with 600 processes."
• Previous message: Lee Chin: "Re: debate on 700 threads vs asynchronous code"
• Maybe in reply to: Grover, Andrew: "[PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)"
• Next in thread: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)"
• Reply: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] ACPI update (20030122)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:32 EST