Re: return-type for search_extable()

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 01:14:14 EST


>>>>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:53:20 +1100, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> said:

  Rusty> Hmm, I actually just tried to do this, and like all typedefs,
  Rusty> it's icky. search_exception_table() belongs in kernel.h, not
  Rusty> module.h where it is now. But that means kernel.h has to
  Rusty> include asm/uaccess.h to get exception_fixup_t.

Yeah, that is a bit ugly.

  Rusty> Maybe the cleanest way really is to simply document that your
  Rusty> search_extable() returns the fixup word... 8(

It turns out that on Dec 18th laster year, HJ Lu fixed the gas bug
that prevented me from using the place-relative relocations. I ended
up biting the bullet and making the bleeding edge assembler a
pre-requisite for building 2.5.59. I try to avoid that, but in this
case, it was better than the alternatives.

Anyhow, it means that we don't need a separate type anymore for ia64.

Thanks,

        --david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:18 EST